|
Pressure Equipment Engineering Services, Inc. performs
fitness-for-service evaluations for pressure vessels, heat
exchangers, boilers, storage tanks, piping and other specialized
equipment to assure the structural integrity of equipment for the
intended design parameters.
Fitness for
service evaluations
are performed for pressure equipment (pressure vessels, heat exchangers,
boilers, storage tanks, piping etc.) for a wide variety of flaws. Some
common type of flaws requiring fitness-for-service evaluations
are listed as follows:
·
Generalized Corrosion
·
Localized Corrosion / Corrosion under insulation
·
Pitting Corrosion
·
Blisters and Laminations
·
Bulging
·
Dents
·
Cracks
·
Fire
Damage
Usually a fitness-for-service evaluation is based on
API-579 (API Recommended practice for fitness for service)
and other applicable codes, standards and specifications. Some of
the more common codes used for design and construction of equipment are
as follows:
·
ASME
Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, Division - 1: Rules
for Construction of Pressure Vessels
·
ASME
Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, Division - 2:
Alternative Rules for Construction of Pressure Vessels
·
ASME
Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, Division - 3:
Alternative Rules for Construction of High Pressure Vessels
·
ASME
Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code, Section I: Rules for Construction
of Power Boilers
·
ASME B31.3:
ASME Code for Process Piping
·
ASME B31.1:
ASME Code for Power Piping
·
EJMA:
Standards of the Expansion Joint Manufacturers Association, Inc.
·
API 650:
Welded Steel Tanks for Oil Storage
·
API 620:
Design & Construction of large, welded, low pressure Storage Tanks
·
AWWA D100-96:
Welded Steel Tanks for Water Storage
TEMA: Standards of Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association
·
BS 5500:
British Specification for Unfired Fusion welded pressure vessels
·
CODAP:
French Code for Pressure Vessel Design
·
AD Merkblätter:
German Pressure Vessel Code
PEESI
has developed expertise to offer life extension considerations
for fixed equipment (Pressure vessels, Heat exchangers, Boilers, Tanks
and Piping) located in refineries, chemical plants and power plants. In
many cases, we achieve this objective without repairs or alteration of
the equipment. In case, the repairs or alterations are necessary for
code compliance or to maintain the mechanical integrity of the
equipment, we provide the best advice to minimize the equipment downtime
usually till the next turnaround. When code guidance is not available,
we use RAGAGEP (Recognized and generally accepted good
engineering practices) and advanced analysis techniques to complete the
fitness for service evaluation.
In
many cases, we perform fitness-for-service evaluations by
using custom and proprietary engineering tools to arrive at the best
possible solution in the most cost effective manner.
For
example, fitness-for-service evaluation may require
calculation of MSOT (Minimum Safe Operating temperature)
below the code specified MDMT (Minimum Design Metal temperature).
As
another example, when the equipment life is depleted due to loss of
originally intended corrosion allowance, we are usually able to get some
life (may be till the next turnaround) out of the equipment based on the
minimum retirement thickness values calculated by us for
various components of the equipment. For this, we take into account all
the considerations required for fitness-for-service evaluations.
These practices usually result in increased remaining safe and useful
life for the equipment and lead to reduced engineering cost, reduced
maintenance cost, reduced inspection cost and low overheads for the
clients. Here are some
examples of fitness-for-service evaluations
performed by Pressure Equipment Engineering Services, Inc. |